March 14, 2013
Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kimball Union | 23-3-0 | .885 | 46 | 131 | 36 | +95 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Belmont Hill | 23-4-1 | .839 | 47 | 115 | 61 | +54 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Dexter | 21-2-5 | .839 | 47 | 137 | 63 | +74 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Berkshire | 22-4-3 | .810 | 47 | 109 | 58 | +51 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Salisbury | 21-5-3 | .776 | 45 | 122 | 52 | +70 | 5-0-0 | W6 |
Frederick Gunn School | 21-5-4 | .767 | 46 | 131 | 64 | +67 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Kents Hill | 18-6-1 | .740 | 37 | 111 | 58 | +53 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Westminster | 18-7-2 | .704 | 38 | 112 | 68 | +44 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Cushing | 19-7-4 | .700 | 42 | 124 | 81 | +43 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
Kent | 18-7-3 | .696 | 39 | 107 | 62 | +45 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Brooks | 17-7-5 | .672 | 39 | 97 | 58 | +39 | 5-0-0 | W6 |
Rivers | 17-9-2 | .643 | 36 | 103 | 59 | +44 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
BB&N | 15-8-3 | .635 | 33 | 105 | 71 | +34 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Middlesex | 14-7-5 | .635 | 33 | 115 | 74 | +41 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Thayer | 14-8-2 | .625 | 30 | 79 | 67 | +12 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Avon Old Farms | 16-9-4 | .621 | 36 | 105 | 64 | +41 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Exeter | 15-9-5 | .603 | 35 | 87 | 76 | +11 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Tilton | 17-12-3 | .578 | 37 | 93 | 72 | +21 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Holderness | 16-12-1 | .569 | 33 | 90 | 93 | -3 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Milton | 13-10-3 | .558 | 29 | 80 | 73 | +7 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Choate | 13-10-3 | .558 | 29 | 88 | 72 | +16 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
Loomis Chaffee | 13-11-1 | .540 | 27 | 72 | 64 | +8 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Winchendon | 12-10-4 | .538 | 28 | 89 | 73 | +16 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
St. Sebastian's | 13-11-3 | .537 | 29 | 91 | 91 | 0 | 0-3-2 | L2 |
Canterbury | 11-10-3 | .521 | 25 | 91 | 84 | +7 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
Berwick | 12-12-1 | .500 | 25 | 101 | 74 | +27 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Governor's | 10-10-5 | .500 | 25 | 74 | 79 | -5 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Deerfield | 11-11-2 | .500 | 24 | 69 | 71 | -2 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Taft | 10-10-2 | .500 | 22 | 79 | 57 | +22 | 4-1-0 | W2 |
Andover | 11-12-2 | .480 | 24 | 82 | 69 | +13 | 4-1-0 | W4 |
Millbrook | 10-11-4 | .480 | 24 | 83 | 71 | +12 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Hebron | 9-10-1 | .475 | 19 | 58 | 63 | -5 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Brunswick | 9-12-3 | .438 | 21 | 62 | 68 | -6 | 3-2-0 | W3 |
Noble & Greenough | 11-15-1 | .426 | 23 | 91 | 99 | -8 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Lawrence Academy | 10-14-3 | .426 | 23 | 93 | 92 | +1 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
Albany Academy | 11-15-0 | .423 | 22 | 71 | 97 | -26 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Moses Brown | 5-7-0 | .417 | 10 | 29 | 48 | -19 | 4-1-0 | W4 |
St. George's | 7-11-4 | .409 | 18 | 69 | 97 | -28 | 1-2-2 | T1 |
St. Mark's | 10-15-2 | .407 | 22 | 87 | 89 | -2 | 2-2-1 | W2 |
Brewster Academy | 8-13-2 | .391 | 18 | 60 | 90 | -30 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
Trinity-Pawling | 9-15-1 | .380 | 19 | 82 | 86 | -4 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
Proctor | 9-16-3 | .375 | 21 | 90 | 108 | -18 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Northfield Mt. Hermon | 9-16-1 | .365 | 19 | 65 | 95 | -30 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
St. Paul's | 9-16-1 | .365 | 19 | 76 | 89 | -13 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
New Hampton | 7-14-3 | .354 | 17 | 50 | 79 | -29 | 2-2-1 | W1 |
Groton | 7-16-2 | .320 | 16 | 60 | 82 | -22 | 2-2-1 | L2 |
Vermont Academy | 6-14-1 | .310 | 13 | 51 | 87 | -36 | 0-5-0 | L6 |
Tabor | 7-18-1 | .288 | 15 | 74 | 110 | -36 | 0-5-0 | L8 |
Worcester Academy | 6-16-0 | .273 | 12 | 47 | 106 | -59 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
Roxbury Latin | 6-17-0 | .261 | 12 | 43 | 109 | -66 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
Hoosac | 4-12-0 | .250 | 8 | 40 | 90 | -50 | 0-5-0 | L5 |
Hotchkiss | 6-19-0 | .240 | 12 | 48 | 103 | -55 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
Pomfret | 4-19-1 | .188 | 9 | 38 | 93 | -55 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Portsmouth Abbey | 3-13-0 | .188 | 6 | 34 | 72 | -38 | 0-5-0 | L6 |
North Yarmouth Academy | 4-18-0 | .182 | 8 | 40 | 101 | -61 | 0-5-0 | L8 |
Williston Northampton | 4-21-1 | .173 | 9 | 66 | 137 | -71 | 0-5-0 | L8 |
Pingree | 4-22-1 | .167 | 9 | 36 | 125 | -89 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
Kingswood Oxford | 1-16-1 | .083 | 3 | 13 | 115 | -102 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.