March 14, 2010
Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dexter | 22-2-1 | .900 | 45 | 151 | 37 | +114 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Frederick Gunn School | 24-4-2 | .833 | 50 | 152 | 69 | +83 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Noble & Greenough | 23-5-1 | .810 | 47 | 144 | 67 | +77 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Kent | 21-5-0 | .808 | 42 | 100 | 45 | +55 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Cushing | 21-5-2 | .786 | 44 | 125 | 73 | +52 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Choate | 19-6-2 | .741 | 40 | 115 | 66 | +49 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
Kimball Union | 22-8-2 | .719 | 46 | 119 | 60 | +59 | 3-2-0 | W3 |
Milton | 19-7-2 | .714 | 40 | 114 | 56 | +58 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Northfield Mt. Hermon | 20-8-1 | .707 | 41 | 145 | 88 | +57 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
Belmont Hill | 19-8-2 | .690 | 40 | 130 | 71 | +59 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Avon Old Farms | 18-7-4 | .690 | 40 | 133 | 74 | +59 | 5-0-0 | W6 |
Groton | 15-7-1 | .674 | 31 | 98 | 58 | +40 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
Salisbury | 15-6-5 | .673 | 35 | 100 | 48 | +52 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
Westminster | 17-8-2 | .667 | 36 | 85 | 60 | +25 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Brewster Academy | 17-9-1 | .648 | 35 | 119 | 102 | +17 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Berkshire | 20-11-0 | .645 | 40 | 158 | 93 | +65 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Brunswick | 11-6-2 | .632 | 24 | 84 | 51 | +33 | 4-0-1 | W4 |
St. George's | 13-8-0 | .619 | 26 | 105 | 85 | +20 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Middlesex | 11-7-1 | .605 | 23 | 75 | 61 | +14 | 2-2-1 | L2 |
Berwick | 12-8-1 | .595 | 25 | 67 | 75 | -8 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
Exeter | 16-11-1 | .589 | 33 | 98 | 74 | +24 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Hebron | 14-10-2 | .577 | 30 | 109 | 69 | +40 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
Winchendon | 13-10-2 | .560 | 28 | 122 | 103 | +19 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Tabor | 13-10-4 | .556 | 30 | 108 | 90 | +18 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Andover | 15-13-0 | .536 | 30 | 91 | 89 | +2 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
Tilton | 14-14-4 | .500 | 32 | 86 | 82 | +4 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
BB&N | 14-14-0 | .500 | 28 | 114 | 117 | -3 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Lawrence Academy | 13-13-2 | .500 | 28 | 102 | 111 | -9 | 4-0-1 | W4 |
Pomfret | 12-12-4 | .500 | 28 | 100 | 103 | -3 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Governor's | 13-13-1 | .500 | 27 | 99 | 101 | -2 | 3-1-1 | T1 |
Vermont Academy | 11-11-1 | .500 | 23 | 108 | 108 | 0 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
South Kent | 13-14-1 | .482 | 27 | 102 | 120 | -18 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Deerfield | 12-13-2 | .481 | 26 | 86 | 80 | +6 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
St. Paul's | 12-13-1 | .481 | 25 | 79 | 83 | -4 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Hotchkiss | 11-12-2 | .480 | 24 | 92 | 86 | +6 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
New Hampton | 11-12-0 | .478 | 22 | 98 | 95 | +3 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Hoosac | 6-7-2 | .467 | 14 | 50 | 55 | -5 | 2-2-1 | W1 |
Taft | 9-11-3 | .457 | 21 | 67 | 58 | +9 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
St. Sebastian's | 10-13-2 | .440 | 22 | 75 | 81 | -6 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Williston Northampton | 10-13-2 | .440 | 22 | 102 | 112 | -10 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Proctor | 11-15-0 | .423 | 22 | 113 | 116 | -3 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Rivers | 9-13-4 | .423 | 22 | 84 | 111 | -27 | 1-2-2 | L1 |
Trinity-Pawling | 8-17-0 | .320 | 16 | 70 | 99 | -29 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Brooks | 6-16-3 | .300 | 15 | 67 | 112 | -45 | 1-3-1 | W1 |
Canterbury | 8-19-0 | .296 | 16 | 85 | 134 | -49 | 0-5-0 | L11 |
Worcester Academy | 6-15-0 | .286 | 12 | 63 | 129 | -66 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Kents Hill | 4-13-2 | .263 | 10 | 41 | 75 | -34 | 0-4-1 | L1 |
Albany Academy | 5-19-1 | .220 | 11 | 81 | 137 | -56 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
North Yarmouth Academy | 5-20-1 | .212 | 11 | 52 | 152 | -100 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Holderness | 4-19-3 | .212 | 11 | 67 | 132 | -65 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Portsmouth Abbey | 3-12-0 | .200 | 6 | 28 | 89 | -61 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
St. Mark's | 4-18-0 | .182 | 8 | 58 | 105 | -47 | 0-5-0 | L5 |
Roxbury Latin | 3-16-1 | .175 | 7 | 64 | 127 | -63 | 0-4-1 | L3 |
Pingree | 4-20-0 | .167 | 8 | 68 | 123 | -55 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Millbrook | 2-21-3 | .135 | 7 | 54 | 130 | -76 | 0-5-0 | L8 |
Loomis Chaffee | 3-22-0 | .120 | 6 | 59 | 133 | -74 | 0-5-0 | L9 |
Thayer | 2-20-0 | .091 | 4 | 38 | 89 | -51 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Kingswood Oxford | 1-20-0 | .048 | 2 | 24 | 174 | -150 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.