March 14, 2011
Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Milton | 25-3-1 | .879 | 51 | 118 | 50 | +68 | 5-0-0 | W12 |
Salisbury | 22-5-0 | .815 | 44 | 124 | 53 | +71 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Cushing | 24-6-0 | .800 | 48 | 145 | 77 | +68 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Dexter | 20-4-3 | .796 | 43 | 141 | 57 | +84 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
Kent | 21-6-0 | .778 | 42 | 134 | 77 | +57 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Albany Academy | 23-7-1 | .758 | 47 | 138 | 92 | +46 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Westminster | 20-6-3 | .741 | 43 | 109 | 57 | +52 | 5-0-0 | W8 |
Groton | 17-6-1 | .729 | 35 | 109 | 77 | +32 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Kimball Union | 22-7-4 | .727 | 48 | 142 | 58 | +84 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
Lawrence Academy | 23-9-0 | .719 | 46 | 136 | 82 | +54 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Avon Old Farms | 18-7-2 | .704 | 38 | 98 | 56 | +42 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
South Kent | 17-7-1 | .700 | 35 | 121 | 64 | +57 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Tilton | 20-10-3 | .652 | 43 | 108 | 60 | +48 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Brunswick | 13-7-1 | .643 | 27 | 77 | 57 | +20 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
New Hampton | 18-10-2 | .633 | 38 | 116 | 89 | +27 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Noble & Greenough | 17-10-0 | .630 | 34 | 120 | 86 | +34 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Northfield Mt. Hermon | 14-8-2 | .625 | 30 | 98 | 79 | +19 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Belmont Hill | 17-10-2 | .621 | 36 | 121 | 73 | +48 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Frederick Gunn School | 19-12-0 | .613 | 38 | 147 | 88 | +59 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Governor's | 17-11-2 | .600 | 36 | 99 | 82 | +17 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Choate | 13-9-1 | .587 | 27 | 114 | 65 | +49 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
St. Sebastian's | 14-10-2 | .577 | 30 | 105 | 80 | +25 | 0-4-1 | L3 |
Hebron | 15-11-2 | .571 | 32 | 107 | 75 | +32 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
Brooks | 11-8-3 | .568 | 25 | 83 | 64 | +19 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Berkshire | 16-12-2 | .567 | 34 | 104 | 84 | +20 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
St. Mark's | 13-11-0 | .542 | 26 | 91 | 79 | +12 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Pomfret | 12-10-2 | .542 | 26 | 89 | 82 | +7 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
BB&N | 14-13-0 | .519 | 28 | 90 | 75 | +15 | 3-2-0 | W2 |
St. Paul's | 13-13-0 | .500 | 26 | 82 | 79 | +3 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
Tabor | 12-12-0 | .500 | 24 | 105 | 110 | -5 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
Taft | 11-12-0 | .478 | 22 | 54 | 70 | -16 | 3-2-0 | W3 |
Berwick | 9-11-2 | .455 | 20 | 71 | 82 | -11 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Rivers | 12-15-1 | .446 | 25 | 84 | 114 | -30 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
Exeter | 12-15-0 | .444 | 24 | 98 | 99 | -1 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
Deerfield | 9-12-4 | .440 | 22 | 85 | 87 | -2 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
Middlesex | 9-12-1 | .432 | 19 | 69 | 65 | +4 | 1-3-1 | L3 |
Millbrook | 9-14-2 | .400 | 20 | 75 | 88 | -13 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
Kents Hill | 6-11-2 | .368 | 14 | 57 | 70 | -13 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Winchendon | 11-20-1 | .359 | 23 | 117 | 153 | -36 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Proctor | 8-16-2 | .346 | 18 | 106 | 143 | -37 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
North Yarmouth Academy | 6-13-3 | .341 | 15 | 54 | 81 | -27 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
Hoosac | 5-10-0 | .333 | 10 | 37 | 60 | -23 | 4-1-0 | W1 |
Andover | 8-17-0 | .320 | 16 | 66 | 110 | -44 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
Trinity-Pawling | 7-16-1 | .313 | 15 | 61 | 99 | -38 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
Pingree | 7-18-2 | .296 | 16 | 63 | 116 | -53 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
Williston Northampton | 6-19-1 | .250 | 13 | 73 | 143 | -70 | 2-2-1 | T1 |
Vermont Academy | 5-17-2 | .250 | 12 | 49 | 119 | -70 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Portsmouth Abbey | 3-12-3 | .250 | 9 | 41 | 82 | -41 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
Hotchkiss | 6-19-0 | .240 | 12 | 65 | 106 | -41 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
Holderness | 6-20-0 | .231 | 12 | 64 | 107 | -43 | 0-5-0 | L12 |
Brewster Academy | 5-17-0 | .227 | 10 | 67 | 109 | -42 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Kingswood Oxford | 4-15-1 | .225 | 9 | 33 | 98 | -65 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
Thayer | 5-18-0 | .217 | 10 | 55 | 99 | -44 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Canterbury | 5-21-1 | .204 | 11 | 70 | 157 | -87 | 0-5-0 | L9 |
Loomis Chaffee | 3-20-2 | .160 | 8 | 48 | 108 | -60 | 0-5-0 | L9 |
Worcester Academy | 3-18-1 | .159 | 7 | 47 | 137 | -90 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
St. George's | 2-17-1 | .125 | 5 | 43 | 127 | -84 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Roxbury Latin | 2-19-1 | .114 | 5 | 37 | 124 | -87 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.