March 14, 2009
Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exeter | 23-4-1 | .839 | 47 | 105 | 59 | +46 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Salisbury | 20-4-3 | .796 | 43 | 110 | 45 | +65 | 5-0-0 | W6 |
Hebron | 19-5-0 | .792 | 38 | 132 | 51 | +81 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Lawrence Academy | 22-6-0 | .786 | 44 | 130 | 74 | +56 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Frederick Gunn School | 22-6-4 | .750 | 48 | 149 | 73 | +76 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Andover | 17-5-4 | .731 | 38 | 110 | 57 | +53 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Belmont Hill | 19-8-1 | .696 | 39 | 115 | 68 | +47 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Noble & Greenough | 19-8-1 | .696 | 39 | 118 | 84 | +34 | 4-0-1 | W4 |
Tabor | 15-6-3 | .688 | 33 | 109 | 84 | +25 | 5-0-0 | W9 |
Hotchkiss | 14-6-2 | .682 | 30 | 79 | 50 | +29 | 2-1-2 | T1 |
Berkshire | 20-9-2 | .677 | 42 | 132 | 86 | +46 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
Groton | 12-5-3 | .675 | 27 | 77 | 43 | +34 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
New Hampton | 15-6-5 | .673 | 35 | 79 | 51 | +28 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
Winchendon | 18-9-0 | .667 | 36 | 133 | 93 | +40 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
North Yarmouth Academy | 14-7-2 | .652 | 30 | 79 | 57 | +22 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Taft | 13-6-4 | .652 | 30 | 84 | 65 | +19 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Dexter | 14-7-3 | .646 | 31 | 78 | 46 | +32 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Westminster | 14-8-3 | .620 | 31 | 85 | 72 | +13 | 3-1-1 | W1 |
Roxbury Latin | 10-7-3 | .575 | 23 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
South Kent | 12-9-0 | .571 | 24 | 99 | 74 | +25 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
St. George's | 12-9-2 | .565 | 26 | 104 | 67 | +37 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
Brewster Academy | 15-12-2 | .552 | 32 | 103 | 101 | +2 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
Cushing | 13-11-3 | .537 | 29 | 98 | 98 | 0 | 3-1-1 | W1 |
Proctor | 14-12-2 | .536 | 30 | 134 | 140 | -6 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Milton | 13-11-4 | .536 | 30 | 74 | 71 | +3 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Governor's | 13-12-1 | .519 | 27 | 99 | 93 | +6 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Kimball Union | 14-13-1 | .518 | 29 | 87 | 78 | +9 | 3-2-0 | W2 |
Deerfield | 11-11-2 | .500 | 24 | 73 | 74 | -1 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Choate | 10-10-4 | .500 | 24 | 94 | 88 | +6 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Worcester Academy | 11-11-1 | .500 | 23 | 62 | 81 | -19 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Kent | 10-11-3 | .479 | 23 | 64 | 63 | +1 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Hoosac | 7-8-0 | .467 | 14 | 54 | 47 | +7 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Williston Northampton | 12-14-2 | .464 | 26 | 99 | 124 | -25 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
Avon Old Farms | 11-13-1 | .460 | 23 | 88 | 83 | +5 | 4-1-0 | W2 |
St. Sebastian's | 10-13-2 | .440 | 22 | 104 | 94 | +10 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Vermont Academy | 7-9-0 | .438 | 14 | 44 | 47 | -3 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
Berwick | 10-13-0 | .435 | 20 | 63 | 66 | -3 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Northfield Mt. Hermon | 9-13-7 | .431 | 25 | 97 | 104 | -7 | 0-4-1 | L2 |
Pingree | 11-15-1 | .426 | 23 | 53 | 84 | -31 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
St. Paul's | 10-14-2 | .423 | 22 | 89 | 75 | +14 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
Brunswick | 7-10-1 | .417 | 15 | 52 | 60 | -8 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Holderness | 9-16-2 | .370 | 20 | 92 | 121 | -29 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
Canterbury | 9-16-2 | .370 | 20 | 107 | 125 | -18 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Trinity-Pawling | 7-14-3 | .354 | 17 | 63 | 94 | -31 | 1-3-1 | W1 |
Middlesex | 5-10-2 | .353 | 12 | 52 | 69 | -17 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
BB&N | 8-17-3 | .339 | 19 | 70 | 112 | -42 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Kents Hill | 5-11-2 | .333 | 12 | 29 | 47 | -18 | 0-4-1 | L4 |
Thayer | 8-17-1 | .327 | 17 | 60 | 96 | -36 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
Rivers | 7-19-3 | .293 | 17 | 84 | 121 | -37 | 1-3-1 | L2 |
Tilton | 6-17-3 | .288 | 15 | 79 | 102 | -23 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Brooks | 6-15-0 | .286 | 12 | 49 | 88 | -39 | 0-5-0 | L5 |
Loomis Chaffee | 5-15-3 | .283 | 13 | 71 | 114 | -43 | 0-3-2 | L2 |
Millbrook | 5-17-3 | .260 | 13 | 68 | 123 | -55 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
Pomfret | 5-22-2 | .207 | 12 | 81 | 123 | -42 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
Albany Academy | 4-22-0 | .154 | 8 | 58 | 168 | -110 | 0-5-0 | L8 |
St. Mark's | 2-19-0 | .095 | 4 | 34 | 149 | -115 | 0-5-0 | L9 |
Portsmouth Abbey | 1-16-1 | .083 | 3 | 35 | 84 | -49 | 0-4-1 | L1 |
Kingswood Oxford | 1-16-1 | .083 | 3 | 22 | 86 | -64 | 1-3-1 | T1 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.